Join Now                                         Blog   LinkedIn   Twitter 

Mature Researcher

Resources for the mature researcher

Recruiting People Living with Dementia to Research Studies

Following the National Dementia Strategy and the Government’s 2020 Dementia Challenge dementia is a priority area for NIHR research funding with a target of increasing the numbers of participants with dementia into clinical research trials to 10% of this patient group. The NIHR has been supporting recruitment of people living with dementia through the NIHR Join Dementia Research register, the ENRICH Engaging Research in Care Homes network and the NIHR Clinical Research Network DeNDRoN. Focused funding calls are also increasing the breadth of research and increasing capacity in this area. Recruiting people living with dementia to research studies however can be challenging. This paper discusses what researchers need to consider when planning a study involving patients with dementia.

Many people with dementia will not have capacity to give informed consent to take part in research. The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) governs how we decide whether a patient has capacity. The MCA is a very clear piece of legislation and before conducting research involving patients living with dementia, you must become familiar with its content, particularly sections 30 to 34 which cover research. Your knowledge of the act needs to be demonstrated in any funding or research ethics application.

Continue Reading

Patient and Public Involvement in Research

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research has become increasingly important over the past 10-15 years as we recognise and appreciate that patients and carers are the end users of health services research. PPI has the potential to improve the relevance and quality of scientific clinical research. PPI is now a necessary and indeed a critical component of all aspects of the research process including development of the research hypothesis, a mandatory requirement in grant applications, monitoring of research activities- recruitment and follow up, data collection, dissemination of research findings and implementation of those findings into clinical practice. There is an ethical and moral conceptualisation for involving service users in research in respecting patients autonomy, enhancing beneficence, and non-maleficence, and observing justice in all encounters including meaningful research participatory relationships (Parekh & Ali 2015; Beauchamp &, Childress 2001 For those working in the clinical arena and are often involved in translational research bringing research outcomes into practical benefits for patients, PPI is not a new phenomenon. For years many have probably had informal PPI in their research programmes. However this has now become more streamlined; for example it is customary for many Funders to ask formally during the grant application process for an explicit statement about how projects can impact on health outcomes within a time frame after project completion and the explicit role of PPI within the research. Indeed funding bodies often involve PPI members in the initial grant evaluation process and funding decisions.  

Continue Reading

Navigating your way through the ethics application process

Download this document in MSWord format


Fantastic, you’ve worked up you research proposal and the study protocol is defined to the smallest of detail. One hurdle remains.. the ethics application! This application, though not the most exciting part of your research journey is a vitally important exercise and, is essential. With more of us contemplating research it is important to be more aware of the processes involved. The aim of this guide is to give an overview of the research application process for those who may be embarking on or thinking of going into research. For those of you who have already started, a short paragraph is dedicated to the process of getting an amendment to your study protocol.

Continue Reading

Presenting Skills

Presenting your Work
There is little point in carrying out research if no-one gets to hear about the results - you might as well not have bothered. Piles of unpublished data benefit neither your fellow clinicians and researchers nor the patients whose welfare is supposed to be the end result. Think of it as equivalent to writing in the notes in clinic - if it isn't written down, it hasn't been done. Another reason to present is to make sure that possible future employers see that you are contributing to geriatrics.

There are two main ways of letting the outside world know about your research results - publication in a scientific journal and presentation at scientific meetings. This article focuses on oral and poster presentations at meetings.

Think early on when planning your research about how you will communicate the results - think about what people will want to know, and this will influence what data you collect.

Who do you want to find out about the results? Geriatricians? Then present at BGS or regional conferences. Cardiologists? Go to the British Cardiac Society or European Society of Cardiology.

Continue Reading

Search (mobile)

We use cookies to improve our website and your experience. Cookies used for the essential operation of the site have already been set. To find out more about the cookies we use and how to delete them, see our Privacy Policy.

I accept cookies from this site