Burden or Benefit? Unmasking anticholinergic burden(ACB) in Care of elderly wards

Abstract ID
4006
Authors' names
Shahnezza Shafri1, Mustafa Mustafa1, Arti Bhagat1, Najat Haroun1, Mitch Fung1, Aisha Malik1
Author's provenances
1 Kettering General Hospital, University Hospitals of Northamptonshire
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction

The elderly are susceptible to the adverse effects of anticholinergic drugs. A high anticholinergic burden from their use has been linked to falls, delirium, functional decline and death. NICE guidelines urges review of these drugs in vulnerable elderly with diagnosed or suspected dementia and falls, and have highlighted the use of ACB scoring tools to facilitate our approach.

Aim

It was observed that ACB assessments were not routinely done in our geriatric wards. We aim to improve compliance with NICE recommendations on ACB assessment in high risk patients and encourage use of a scoring tool to guide deprescribing.

Method

A prospective study across all five geriatric wards. Inclusion criteria would be patients admitted to the CoE wards due to: 

1) Falls (Group 1)

2) Other issues with a background of dementia (Group 2)

Exclusion criteria: Patients on end of life care

Results

ACB Assessment 

Among Group 1, ACB assessment was carried out in 6 out of 24 patients (25%); 3 patients were assessed with a scoring tool. Among Group 2, ACB assessment was carried out in 3 out of 16 patients (18.8%); none were assessed using a scoring tool. 13 patients out of all patients had a high ACB score (as calculated by the author).

Deprescribing 

4 of the high ACB patients had plans; 3 with documented assessments. Amitriptyline and solifenacin were deprescribed; solifenacin continued in one as it provides clinical benefit.

Conclusion

The practice of ACB assessments were inconsistent across both patient groups and the utility of an ACB tool was poor. Our findings suggest that a purposeful effort to reduce ACB is more likely to occur in patients whose ACB was assessed clearly via scoring using a tool. Raising awareness among resident doctors of the significance of tackling ACB in the elderly and the use of a tool to facilitate deprescribing would be crucial to improve compliance with current guidelines and improve patient care.

Comments

A valuable project highlighting inconsistent ACB assessment despite clear guideline recommendations. The findings show a real need for better awareness and routine use of scoring tools to support safer prescribing. A clear, important reminder of how improving ACB practice can directly benefit vulnerable older patients.

Submitted by avtar.singh@wa… on

Permalink

There is a need to intervene in light of the inconsistent ACB assessments to improve compliance and patient care in this regard - especially through teaching resident doctors possibly in the beginning of their rotation in the department i.e., during the induction meeting, and having posters in the wards as a prompt to score ACB using an ACB calculator

This was really clear and interesting to read, especially how you highlighted the gaps in ACB assessments. It feels like a project that could make a real difference with just a bit more awareness and consistency on the wards.

Submitted by delvia.jacobma… on

Permalink

Nice poster. It is indeed important to review medications from ACB perspective especially in elderly patient while doing CGA.

Submitted by doctorsyedshoa… on

Permalink