Development and Validation of the ‘EHSAS’ Tool for Older People in Rural India A Novel, Brief Screening Tool for Community Health Workers to Identify Older Adults Needing Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment

Abstract ID
3698
Authors' names
Jaya Singh Kshatri 1,2 , Soumya Ranjan Sahu1, Supriya Darshini Behera1, Daisy J.A. Janssen3, Susan D. Shenkin2, Sanghamitra Pati1
Author's provenances
¹ICMR-RMRC Bhubaneswar, India; ²University of Edinburgh, UK; 3Maastricht University, The Netherlands
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Background:
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a cornerstone of geriatric care, but is challenging to implement in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to scale, workforce limitations and the absence of culturally appropriate tools. Community Health Workers (CHWs) play a critical role in rural India, yet they lack a suitable screening instrument to identify older adults who require further and detailed CGA.

Objectives:
To develop and validate the Elderly Health Status Assessment and Screening (EHSAS) tool—a concise, culturally adapted, and multidimensional screening tool for early identification of common geriatric syndromes among rural community-dwelling older adults in India.

Methods:
We employed a three-phase mixed-methods approach: tool development (literature review, expert consensus, face and content validation, field testing with older adults and CHWs), scale development (exploratory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity testing), and scale evaluation (cut-off score determination, diagnostic accuracy testing, and reliability assessment). The tool’s performance was benchmarked against standard geriatric assessment instruments, with frailty status as the criterion variable.

Results:
The final EHSAS tool comprises 11 items spanning the key geriatric domains, excluding the frailty item. A cut-off of ≥3 “Yes” responses was selected based on ROC curve analysis and Youden’s Index to maximise sensitivity and specificity. It demonstrated good psychometric properties, including high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.7), substantial test-retest reliability (Cohen’s kappa > 0.79), and balanced diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 76.3%, specificity 76.5%, negative predictive value 93.2%). Field testing confirmed that EHSAS was usable by and acceptable to CHWs and older adults.

Conclusion:
The EHSAS tool fills a critical gap in geriatric care in LMIC settings by offering a validated, brief, and culturally appropriate screening instrument for CHWs. Its adoption can strengthen early detection of geriatric syndromes and support timely referrals for CGA, ultimately improving health outcomes for older adults in resource-constrained rural areas.