Dual-belt Treadmill Training with Open-skill Stepping Tasks in Day-care Rehabilitation Users: Effects on Balance and Cognition

Abstract ID
4648
Authors' names
Masanori Wakida1, Takahito Wada2,3, Ryo Kubota2,3, Hiroaki Tanaka3,4, Kimihiko Mori1, Kimitaka Hase3,4
Author's provenances
1 Faculty of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University,2 Dept of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University Kori Hospital,3 Dept of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University,4 Dept of Rehabilitation, Kansai Medical University Hospital
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction: Day-care rehabilitation users are at high risk of falls, and pragmatic interventions deliverable within routine services are needed. Dual-belt treadmill training can provide task-specific balance challenges while maintaining a feasible dose. We examined whether adding dual-belt treadmill balance training to routine rehabilitation is associated with improvements in dynamic balance/mobility and cognition in very old adults.

Method: This single-group pre–post study included 47 day-care rehabilitation users (age 81.4±6.7 years). Participants continued routine rehabilitation (strength and aerobic training) and additionally performed dual-belt treadmill balance training once weekly for 20 minutes over 3 months (~12 sessions). The dual-belt training used an open-skill task in which random numbers were displayed on a monitor and participants moved forward/backward and side-to-side between lanes to press the corresponding target button at one of four corners, aiming to elicit both voluntary and reactive multi-directional stepping. Outcomes were assessed pre and post: Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CB&M), Trail Making Test Part A (TMT-A), Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Paired t-tests were used for CB&M and FES; Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for TMT-A and MoCA. Effect sizes were reported as Cohen’s dz (CB&M) and rank-biserial r (MoCA). Exploratory analyses examined baseline dependency and associations between change in balance/mobility (ΔCB&M) and changes in other outcomes.

Results: CB&M improved from 41.9±16.1 to 47.2±16.1 (p<0.001; Cohen’s dz=0.69). MoCA improved from 22.0±4.5 to 23.0±5.0 (p=0.027; rank-biserial r=0.38). TMT-A and FES showed no significant pre–post changes. Greater MoCA gain occurred in those with lower baseline MoCA (r=-0.50, p<0.001). Improvements in balance/mobility were associated with cognitive change (ΔMoCA vs ΔCB&M: r=0.40, p=0.006) and with FES change (r=-0.33, p=0.024).

Conclusion: A 3-month, once-weekly dual-belt treadmill balance training added to routine day-care rehabilitation was associated with meaningful improvement in dynamic balance/mobility and a small improvement in global cognition. Future controlled studies should confirm causality and clarify which individuals benefit most.