How well are CT Head scans following inpatient falls adhering to NICE and RCR guidelines?

Abstract ID
3347
Authors' names
Ankit Regmi1, Riddhi Goel1, Aditi Singh1, Katie Honney1
Author's provenances
1. Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn 2. Geriatric Medicine, QEHKL
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction:

Inpatient falls are common and serious issue in healthcare, often leading to complications like traumatic brain injuries. Timely and appropriate evaluation using Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the head is crucial for diagnosing and managing those injuries. Clinical guidelines, such as those established by the National Institute for Health and Care and Excellence (NICE) and Royal College of Radiology (RCR) outline when CT head should be performed after a fall to ensure timely intervention and efficient use of resources.
However, adherence to this guideline varies,  sometimes leading to delay in diagnosis, potential overuse/misuse of imaging resources and inconsistent patient outcomes.

Method:

• Sample size: 33
• Inclusion: All patients who had CTH following an inpatient fall between 31/3/2024 to 31/5/2024.
• Range of audit: Data collection was done from DATIX record of inpatient fall in QEHKL from 31/3/2024 to 31/5/2024.

Results:

• Out of 33, only 8 events (24.3%) were documented to have indication for CTH within 1 hour according to NICE guidelines, and only 2 events had CTH within this time. 5
times CTH was done within 8 hours, and 1 had CTH in more than 8 hours’ time.
• Out of 33 events, 12 (36.3%) were documented to have indication for CTH within 8 hours according to NICE guidelines. 7 underwent CTH within 8 hours and rest 5 of the CTH was done >8 hour of CTH request.
• Out of 33, 13 fall events (39.3%) have documentations that do not meet the CTH criteria according to NICE guidelines.
• Out of 33 CTH performed, 22 (66.6%) of provisional reporting was made within 1 hour of CTH.

Conclusion:

The audit revealed gaps in compliance with NICE guidelines, particularly in the timely execution of CTH scans and the commencement of neuro-observation. These discrepancies may be attributed to factors such  as incomplete documentation, delays in clinical decision-making, and potential misinterpretation of guidelines.