Improving documentation of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in a new electronic patient record system across care settings

Abstract ID
3830
Authors' names
E James1; J Mann2; J Raghu3; S Hasan1
Author's provenances
1. King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust; 2. Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust; 3. Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction:
In October 2023, the electronic patient record system Epic® was introduced across two London NHS Foundation Trusts — King's College Hospital (KCH) and Guy's & St Thomas' (GSTT). This replaced legacy documentation processes, including the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA). At KCH, a CGA template widely used by the multidisciplinary team was lost, leading to inconsistent CGA documentation, poor communication of outcomes at discharge, and reduced data usability. This quality improvement project aimed to standardise CGA documentation and communication across care settings.

Methods:
A cross-site working group was formed including IT colleagues focused on Epic® optimisation. Key CGA domains and standard descriptors were agreed. New 'SmartPhrases' were created to present CGA findings clearly and these embedded into a redesigned discharge summary template. The Epic® CGA Navigator tab was rebuilt to support streamlined, structured data entry, enabling automatic population of discharge documents. Implementation was supported by departmental teaching and integration into ward rounds on a pilot ward at each Trust. Pre-intervention, a random sample of discharge summaries from geriatric wards was assessed for inclusion and clarity of CGA domains; post-intervention, discharge summaries from pilot wards were analysed.

Results:
Pre-intervention, discharge summaries included an average of one CGA domain. Post-intervention, this increased to average five domains at KCH and four at GSTT. At least seven domains were included in 26% (10/38) and 16% (5/32) of discharge summaries at KCH and GSTT, respectively. Clarity improved from 11% (10/89) to 47% (18/38) at KCH, and 27% (41/153) to 56% (18/32) at GSTT.

Conclusion: This cross-site initiative improved CGA documentation and communication, enhancing clarity and consistency of discharge information. There has been an evolution in phraseology, particularly around the domains included within a CGA. Getting hospital-wide CGA will be an important enabler in frailty-attuned care across acute and community settings.

Comments

Can definitely associate with the feeling of all CGA documentation being lost at implementation of new EPRs. Helpful to see how you went about embedding it in the EPR. Thank you for sharing

Submitted by michelle.bull_23544 on

Permalink

Interesting, thanks - have you also found EPIC has improved general efficiency as well with WRs, Documentation etc? Anecdotally I have heard it significantly speeds up WR times

Submitted by zak.arrain@hot… on

Permalink