Posters for 2026 POPS (Perioperative Care of Older People Undergoing Surgery) Meeting

View or comment on posters presented at BGS events

My posters
Displaying 1 - 20 of 54

Recognising nutritional risk status of older adults undergoing elective surgery in a tertiary hospital in Wales.

Authors' names
Rebecca Male1; Emily Capener2; Charlotte Dowd2; YuenKang Tham3; Margaret Coakley4; Nia Humphry3
Abstract content

Introduction Malnutrition in older adults undergoing surgery is associated with increased adverse outcomes, hospitalisation and length of stay.  Preoperative nutrition risk screening is recommended for all patients undergoing intermediate or major surgery. In 2024, a Perioperative care of Older People undergoing Surgery (POPS) service was established in a tertiary centre to deliver comprehensive preoperative assessment and optimisation. In the absence of dietetic funding, a nutrition pathway was implemented to identify patients at risk of malnutrition using the Malnutrition Universal Screening

Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Shared decision making prior to emergency laparotomy: the perspectives of healthcare professionals, patients and their family

Authors' names
Samuel Lawday, Spaniel Study Group
Abstract content
Background Emergency laparotomy (EmLap) is associated with high post-operative morbidity and mortality, especially in patients living with frailty. Patients who do survive can suffer a significant reduction in levels of independence and quality of life. Decision making and information exchange in this context is therefore critically important. Methods Semi structured interviews with patients and healthcare professionals were undertaken to identify factors recognised as important to the decision making process in the context of EmLap. Non-participatory ethnography at three different acute NHS
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Shared decision making prior to emergency laparotomy: the perspectives of healthcare professionals, patients and their family

Authors' names
Samuel Lawday1, Vig Goplan1,2, Leila Rooshenas1,3, Jane Blazeby1,3, Tim Stephens4, Angus McNair3,5
Abstract content
Background Emergency laparotomy (EL) is associated with significant patient morbidity and mortality, with potential subsequent reduction in post-operative quality of life and loss of independence. The decision to undergo an EL is therefore important. This project aimed to understand stakeholder perceptions of the decision making process in the context of EL. Methods Semi structured qualitative interviews were undertaken with relevant healthcare professionals, patients who had undergone an EL and family members involved in the decision making process prior to an EL. Interviews took place online
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Perioperative Nicotine for Postoperative Pain and Nausea: A Systematic Review with Clinical and Methodological Insights

Authors' names
F Almogbel1; M Alghamdi2; A Elkarouri3; A Alharbi4; L Almutairy5; L Alzimami6; A Medkhali7; R Aloufi8; S Alotaibi9; R Allehyani9; J Alabdualqader10; M Awaji11
Abstract content
Abstract Nicotine has been investigated in prior studies for its analgesic effects and its impact on postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), yet results have been inconsistent. Objectives This systematic review and narrative synthesis evaluates the effects of perioperative nicotine administration on postoperative pain control and PONV in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted, and findings were summarized narratively. Comprehensive searches were performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Closing the Frailty Gap: Developing an Integrated Trauma and Perioperative Older Persons Service in a District General Hospital

Authors' names
H Cumming, C Bracewell, C Jackman, J Pickles
Abstract content

Background Older adults with frailty presenting with trauma or requiring emergency surgery represent a high-risk population with complex medical, cognitive and functional needs. While specialist older persons surgical services are increasingly established in tertiary centres, many district general hospitals (DGHs) lack dedicated frailty provision for emergency surgical patients. This variation affects patient outcomes, adherence to national standards and workforce sustainability, highlighting the need for pragmatic, deliverable models within existing DGH resources. Our aim was to develop and

Determining Outcomes of the Geriatrics Surgical Liaison MDT

Authors' names
O Ward; M McGlone; S Smart; M Milligan; J Tilston; K Colquhoun
Abstract content
Intro The geriatrics surgical liaison MDT aims to identify surgical patients with frailty who would benefit from comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). This involves taking referrals from both the surgical team and AHPs. There are weekly MDT meetings to identify rehab goals and any other relevant aspects of CGA assessment. Aim To determine the outcomes of the geriatrics surgical liaison MDT. Methods All patients who were discussed at the MDT meeting in a 14-week period from March to June 2026 were identified. A review of case notes was carried out to determine outcomes e.g. number of times
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

ELLSA Geriatrician Review - Setting Up a Service at the Glasgow Royal Infirmary

Authors' names
C Gregg1; N Thomson1; K Colquhoun1.
Abstract content

1.Introduction The Emergency Laparotomy and Laparoscopy Scottish Audit (ELLSA) commenced in 2019. This partly considers whether a geriatrician has reviewed patients undergoing emergency laparotomy aged over 65 with frailty or over 80. The ELLSA 2024 report showed the national average geriatrician review was 32.3% (target 75%). Glasgow Royal Infirmary had no dedicated laparotomy in-reach geriatrician process; therefore, we started developing a service. 2. Method Commencing January 2026, a spreadsheet of all patients over 75 for geriatrician review was made. Referral was placed by a dedicated

Improvement Of Discharge Summaries in Orthopaedics and Orthogeriatrics Perioperative Patients

Authors' names
H Machnouk1; S Joomye1; R Larsen1
Abstract content
Introduction: Accurate discharge summaries are essential for ensuring continuity of care, particularly for frail orthopaedic patients. High-quality discharge communication has been associated with reduced post-discharge adverse events, medication errors, and hospital readmissions, while improving patient understanding of management plans. Following feedback from general practitioners regarding incomplete discharge summaries, we undertook this quality improvement project to evaluate the quality of orthopaedic discharge summaries and identify areas requiring improvement to support safe
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Prehabilitation in frail older adults undergoing general surgery: A literature review on outcomes and best practice

Authors' names
Gabriella Baldacchino
Abstract content

Background: Individuals aged 60 years and above are undergoing surgical procedures, including resections for solid organ tumours. Surgery poses a significant physiological stress that disrupts normal homeostasis by affecting both the neuroendocrine and immune systems. When coupled with frailty, tumour-related metabolic demand and multiple co-morbidities, surgical stress predisposes older adults to poorer surgical outcomes, lower quality of life and institutionalisation. Prehabilitation aims to improve postoperative outcomes and enhance tolerance to surgical stress by optimising patients’

How do commonly used risk assessment scores compare in predicting perioperative outcomes following hip fracture surgery?

Authors' names
Avtaar Singh1, Douglas Bairstow1
Abstract content
Introduction: Hip fractures are associated with significant mortality, prolonged hospital admission and loss of independence in older adults. Several risk assessment scores, including the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS) and RHMP30 score, are used to estimate patient risk. This study compared the association between these scoring systems and clinically relevant outcomes following hip fracture surgery to explore whether any score demonstrated a more consistent relationship with patient outcomes. Methods: A
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Developing a POPS Service Within Existing Resources: Data From the First 100 Arthroplasty Patients

Authors' names
A Coward; S Mee; E Hadley; E Ray Chadhuri; J Nutt; H Wilson
Abstract content
Introduction The NHS is under unprecedented financial pressure, and emerging perioperative services for older people undergoing surgery are often difficult to fund, even where economic modelling suggests potential savings. After securing Royal Surrey Charity funding to join Cohort 4 of the NHS Elect POPS Improvement Collaborative, it became clear that funding for a new proactive POPS service would not be available. The team therefore explored what could be achieved within existing funded services for patients living with frailty who were referred for hip or knee arthroplasty. Method Quality

Twists and turns: A sigmoid volvulus clinical re-audit

Authors' names
F Norridge 1; C Pueblo 1; T Dudding 2 ; I Fecher-Jones 3 ; M West 2, 4
Abstract content

Introduction: Sigmoid volvulus (SV) is a common cause of large bowel obstruction in older adults, carrying high morbidity, mortality, and recurrence. Following a previous audit, a local SV management pathway based on international guidelines (Tian et al., 2023) was introduced in 2024 to standardise care. This re-audit evaluated pathway compliance and its clinical impact. Methods: Data was extracted retrospectively from electronic inpatient records for all patients admitted with SV between October 2024 and May 2026. Patient status at time of audit was also noted. Measures included demographics

Frailty, Optimisation and Shared Decision-Making: Evaluation of an Orthogeriatric Preoperative Clinic for Older Patients

Authors' names
D Whitehouse; G Shepherd; K Shah; S Ralhan
Abstract content

The Orthogeriatric pre-operative assessment clinic was established in 2021 at the Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, to support frail older adults being considered for elective orthopaedic procedures, including complex revision surgery. We evaluated outcomes for 50 consecutive patients assessed by the service. We interrogated the notes of 50 patients seen looking at demographics (including age and frailty), comorbidities, origin of referrals, wait times, issues identified in clinic, operation type, post-operative outcomes and mortality. The average wait time for a clinic review was 2.5 weeks

Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Evaluating treatment burden associated with contemporary quadruple heart failure therapy in older adults - a systematic review

Authors' names
Shereen Ahmad1, Isha Sohail1, Zuha Akthar1
Abstract content

Background: Heart failure is a predominant cause of hospital admissions, and this mainly affects adults over the age of 65. Extensive research has shown that four-pillar medical therapy increasingly improved clinical outcomes for this age group. Despite this, adherence is relatively poor, particularly in frail adults, to this guideline-directed medical therapy. Thus, it is vital to explore the reasons for non-adherence so that we can treat patients more holistically and continue to improve clinical outcomes in this population. Aim: to evaluate other imperative outcomes of quadruple therapy for

Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Improving Peri-Operative Assessment for Older Adults Undergoing Elective Cancer Surgery at Kings College Hospital

Authors' names
Georgia Whitlow1, Nicola Lochrie 2, Mark Rose3
Abstract content

Introduction There has been a global increase in the number of older adults undergoing elective and emergency surgery in the last 50 years. Frailty, cognitive dysfunction and multi morbidity negatively impact peri-operative outcomes. Roughly 15% of patients over 65 having surgery at Kings College Hospital are frail but previously there was no pathway in place to perform timely CGA or optimise for surgery. Methods We have set up a Geriatrician led pre-operative clinic for older adults being considered for cancer surgery. We see patients who are over 65 with a CFS of 4 and above with either

Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Compliance with NELA and BGS-CPOC Standards in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: A Single-Centre Audit

Authors' names
S Mathur; S Singh
Abstract content
Compliance with NELA and BGS-CPOC Standards in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: A Single-Centre Audit Introduction Frailty is associated with increased postoperative complications, prolonged hospital stay and higher mortality following emergency laparotomy. The British Geriatrics Society–Centre for Perioperative Care (BGS–CPOC) and the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) recommend: frailty assessment within four hours of admission in all patients aged ≥65 years; comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) for patients with frailty and all patients aged ≥80 years; and
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) Assessment in Urology Emergency Patients: How are we doing?

Authors' names
JG Galton, AK James, V Koo
Abstract content

Introduction: Clinical frailty affects over 1.5 million people in the UK in 2025. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a validated tool recommended nationally for assessing frailty in all emergency hospital admissions over 65 years. Frailty assessment is important for surgical admissions as a CFS score ≥4 is independently associated with increased rate of complications and mortality. The aim of this project is to improve the assessment of frailty in emergency urology admissions at the Alexandra Hospital using the documentation of a CFS score as a primary outcome and social history documentation

Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Identifying Patients for Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Medical Student-Led Frailty Recognition in General Surgery

Authors' names
A MacDonald¹; H Mottershead²; H Kolo²; J Lowrie²; S Alder²; L Brodie²; A Bertram²; R Soiza²
Abstract content

Introduction Older people living with frailty admitted under General Surgery frequently have complex medical needs and experience poorer surgical outcomes. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)-based perioperative services are therefore recommended. ¹–⁴ Baseline evaluation at NHS Grampian demonstrated limited frailty recognition and no geriatrician-led reviews despite substantial unmet need and an established geriatrics liaison service. A medical student-led quality improvement project was undertaken during the wider development of a General Surgery Perioperative Medicine for Older People

The Clinical Frailty Score as a Tool to Prioritise Ortho-Geriatric Resources: A Retrospective Audit in Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

Authors' names
Erin McDonald 1, Sophie Marriott 1, Jennifer Lowrie 2
Abstract content
Introduction With an ever-growing frail population, the workload on ortho-geriatric services continues to increase and strategies to prioritise these resources must be identified. Within Aberdeen Royal Infirmary (ARI), the service predominantly comprises a team of ANPs with liaison consultant cover. The department was recently selected for a trial of an increase to daily consultant cover, with Clinical Frailty Scores (CFS) utilised as the triage tool for highlighting those with the highest frailty for increased and early senior medical input. Method Data from a two-week period in December 2025
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

One-year outcomes of patients who do not proceed with surgery following comprehensive review in a tertiary centre.

Authors' names
Ff Evans 1; M Coakley 2; N Humphry 3
Abstract content
Introduction:  The Perioperative care of Older People undergoing Surgery (POPS) team supports optimisation and shared decision-making for older patients living with frailty who are being considered for surgery. Following this comprehensive assessment a proportion of patients (~14%) do not proceed with the planned surgery, but no standardised follow up process is in place. This retrospective study assessed 12-month outcomes for this cohort. Method:  Patients seen by POPS between September 2022 and June 2025 who did not proceed with proposed surgery were selected from the POPS database. Data
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category