Abstract
Introduction
Pain is a common yet under-recognised and debilitating symptom among elderly patients, particularly with dementia, cognitive impairment, or communication barriers. Inadequate assessment can result in adverse outcomes, including reduced mobility, falls, and prolonged hospitalisation. This Quality Improvement Project aims to improve compliance with pain assessment and documentation on acute and frailty geriatric wards. At our hospital, a gap in systematic pain assessment was identified, hence we sought to address this by implementing standardized protocols, enhancing timely recognition, effective management, and overall quality of care.
Methods
A retrospective review of medical notes from 20 patients admitted to the long-stay COTE ward assessed pain inquiry and documentation during the first three days of admission to the Frailty and Acute Geriatric wards, including site, severity, and collateral history. Targeted interventions, such as teaching structured pain assessment, ward posters reinforcing documentation, collateral history prompts, and visual tools for patients with dementia or language barriers, were introduced. Data was re-collected after four weeks and compared with the initial cycle.
Results
Pain assessment improved from 35% to 75% and site documentation from 86% to 100% when pain was present. Severity assessment showed little change (14% to 16%) and collateral history remained unchanged. However, severity assessment remained poor, underscoring the need for a more systematic approach that includes less commonly assessed sites such as the back and arms. Staff attrition during the August changeover highlighted the need for ongoing teaching and reinforcement of pain protocols for new doctors.
Conclusion
The first cycle showed inconsistent documentation, while the second demonstrated improved pain enquiry and complete site documentation. A doctor survey confirmed earlier pain identification, underscoring the importance of standardising this process to optimise recognition, management, and outcomes in this vulnerable population. Targeted teaching and ward posters further strengthened routine pain assessment, raising awareness and supporting patient-centred care.
Comments
A thoughtful + topical QIP,…
A thoughtful + topical QIP, with an amazing improvement in assessment rates of 35% —> 75%! I agree that ongoing teaching is so important given constant medical staff turnover each year. It’s interesting that there wasn’t any improvement in collateral history, when it can be so crucial particularly in patient’s with dementia where family or carers may be able to pick up on subtle changes / signs that we might miss. Do you have any plans for another cycle with regards to collateral history?
Thank you very much for your…
Thank you very much for your thoughtful and valuable feedback and kind words. I completely agree that ongoing teaching is essential, especially with regular staff rotations, to sustain improvement. You’ve made an excellent point regarding collateral history it indeed plays a vital role, particularly in patients with cognitive impairment. I’m pleased to mention that there is a parallel ongoing QIP within our department focusing specifically on improving collateral history documentation. And we are also considering directing the next cycle of this QIP towards addressing identified gaps such as severity documentation and collateral history.
Insightful QIP
This QIP improved the act of assessing and documenting the location of pain and highlighted the need for further intervention to improve quality of assessment such as pain severity and collateral information.
Thank you very much for your…
Thank you very much for your feedback.. I appreciate your time and insight..
Very thoughtful QIP
This is an interesting QIP that looks at a very relevant topic that is often missed in hospitals- pain. I would like to ask how often was pain assessed or re-assessed in patients?
Thank you for your kind…
Thank you for your kind feedback and for your insightful question.. In our quality improvement project, pain was assessed on admission and re-assessed during daily ward rounds, with documentation reviewed over the first three days of each patient’s stay..