Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The increasing prevalence of frailty in the ageing UK population poses significant challenges for healthcare systems, particularly in emergency departments (EDs). Frailty is a leading factor in hospital readmissions among individuals over 65 years old. This project aims to analyze readmissions of frail patients within 7 and 30 days of ED discharge following comprehensive geriatric assessments (CGAs).
METHOD
This retrospective audit aimed to identify 7 day and 30 day readmissions of patients discharged by the Frailty Emergency Service (FES) at Leicester Royal Infirmary over a six-month period (April–September 2021) and potential readmissions related to the first presentation. Data were collected using Electronic Health Records and anonymized by the ED audit team, with variables including age, gender, ethnicity, readmission status within 7 and 30 days, and reasons for readmission. Preventability of readmissions was assessed by comparing diagnosis from the first visit and the following admission to the hospital, considering positive if at least one diagnosis was repeated, a descriptive statistical analysis was performed. The scope of practice involves only patients older than 65 that have a CFS of 6 or above for any reason, or a CFS of 4 and above but have presented to ED with a geriatric syndrome
RESULTS
During the six-month period beginning April 1, 2021, the FES team in ED performed 749 discharges, including 705 primary visits and 34 revisits (4,6%). Of the 749 discharges, 110 patients required hospital readmission within 30 days, resulting in an overall readmission rate of 14,68%, increasing to 15,68% when adjusted for primary visits on the first 30 days and 52 on the first 7 days which represents 6,94% readmission rate in total. The potential preventable visits for the first 7 days after discharge was 40 (76,92%) and 68 (61,81%) in the first 30 days. The primary reasons for readmissions included falls, infections, delirium, and social problems. For patients with multiple visits, only data from the initial visit was included in the analysis.
CONCLUSION(S)
The overall results reveal FES readmission rates align with global CGA studies but highlight potential for improvement. Falls and infections were identified as primary causes of readmissions, with insufficient MDT involvement linked to higher rates. A multifactorial intervention, emphasizing MDT collaboration, team expansion, and improved follow-up care, is proposed to reduce readmissions.
Comments
The multifactorial…
The multifactorial intervention is so important to support with readmission avoidance. We are doing something similar at Whipps Cross Hospital however we have an OT and PT base in ED at the triage point to support with a holistic assessment including falls and delirium.
comparative data?
This is interesting and you say the results align with global CGA studies - do you have the references for those or the comparative figures? Are there benchmarks that are used across the UK to monitor (reductions in) readmissions as a metric for frailty assessments?
As far as I am aware there…
As far as I am aware there are no benchmarks.
But there is an article from age and ageing from the same hosptial with comparative data about readmissions. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/aft087.
The results are similar, however we have to consider for the present article a sample size was not calculated, therefore, it may not be enough numbers to compare to the original article.
Admission Avoidance Importance
Really interesting study reviewing what the common reasons for readmission are despite full CGA.
Do all frail patients in ED see the FES team or would patients be discharged without being reviewed by this team? It would be interesting to compare the readmission rates without and with the input of FES.
Some of the patients would…
Some of the patients would be discharged by ED before fES, but liekly the more complex medical/social would have been listed for admission and later seen by FES.
CFS Scoring
Thanks.- Interesting read. Given the inclusion criteria, in the study who was initially assessing the CFS score? ED or The Frailty Team?
CFS Scoring
CFS scoring was done by ED team. It is done on arrival by ED nurses for every patient older than 65.
ED CFS Scoring
Great poster, thank you!
How do your ED team assess CFS? Is it using the app/poster or do you deliver specific training to help them score correctly to identify the correct patients for the frailty team to see?
Thanks!