Acceptability of a Technology-Based Dual-Task Programme for Falls Prevention – A Mixed-Methods Study

Abstract ID
3790
Authors' names
P Mathur1; A Stathi1; V Goodyear1; T Krauss2; A Cooper1; C Miller3; H Thomas2; N Ives1; P Kinghorn1; L Magill1; M Chechlacz1; D Wilson1; SY Chiou1
Author's provenances
1School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham; 2 Solihull Community Specialist Falls Service, Solihull Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust; 3. Physiotherapy Department, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction

Falls are a major health concern for older adults. Dual-task (DT) training, which integrates cognitive and physical exercises, has shown greater benefits for balance and mobility than physical training alone. This study evaluated the acceptability of a blended DT training programme, combining supervised and self-directed components, and delivered via a mobile application for older adults with a history of falls.  

Methods

Community-dwelling older adults aged 65+ with ≥2 falls in the past year were recruited. Participants completed the DT programme using the Peak Brain Training app: 12 weeks of blended supervised and self-directed training (Phase 1) and 12 weeks of self-directed training (Phase 2). Adherence was self-reported, and post-programme focus groups were conducted. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, and qualitative data using Framework Analysis.

Results

Forty-three participants were recruited (39 via community events; 27 females, mean age: 79 years) and 4 via NHS falls prevention services referrals (3 females, mean age: 75 years). Adherence was 80.6% in Phase 1, dropping to 50% in Phase 2. Retention was 79.9%. Focus group feedback (n = 28; 20 females) indicated a preference for in-person recruitment over text/letter invitations, an explanation for low NHS referral uptake. Key facilitators of adherence included social interaction, structured routines, a sense of achievement, enjoyment of the app, and the blended delivery format. Barriers included competing priorities, low motivation, unsuitable home environments, and lack of personalised exercises. 

Conclusions

The DT programme was acceptable to older adults, particularly the supervised components. Social and structured routines supported adherence. Reduced adherence in phase 2 highlights the need for additional strategies to sustain motivation. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using technology to deliver cognitively engaging interventions. When paired with structured support, technology can be effectively integrated into fall prevention exercise programmes for older adults with a history of falls. 

Comments

Hi, this seems like a great idea, train brain and body at the same time.

I think your point about low recruitment from those already known an NHS falls service exposes how hard it can be to recruit from this patient population - the ultra-frail tip of the frailty iceberg.

Wish you all the best with phase 2. 

Submitted by martyn.patel12 on

Permalink

Thank you so much for your comment Martyn! 

Yes, indeed. Would really like to explore other ways of exploring this specific population in the next full trial of our study. 

Submitted by p.s.mathur@bha… on

In reply to by martyn.patel12

Permalink

Beyond self reported adherence - did you have a subset of participants who also used wearable devices?  

Would it be practical to introduce self measurable outcomes such as 5X STS or a 30s chair stand?

Submitted by christopher.lien on

Permalink

Thank you for your questions, Christopher :)

  1. We didn’t give participants wearable devices to track adherence. We originally thought that we could collect adherence from the app they used to complete cognitive training; however, that was not feasible, as the app did not report daily adherence. It’s something we may build into the next trial. 
  2. For the feasibility study, we used FES-I, ECog-12, EQ-5D-5L and ModRUM for resource use, along with the Timed Up and Go in both normal and cognitive. During the focus groups, participants said they enjoyed the TUG and wanted more tests that reflect their physical health. So, we will definitely consider 5X STS or a 30s chair stand test for the next full-scale trial.

 

Submitted by p.s.mathur@bha… on

In reply to by christopher.lien

Permalink