Therapists’ perspectives on a new Structured Tailored approach to Rehabilitation AfTer hIp FragilitY fracture – the STRATIFY feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Abstract ID
3675
Authors' names
Charlie Surman; Rhian Milton-Cole; Rebecca Edwards; Stefanny Guerra; Salma Ayis; Aicha Goubar; Nadine E Foster; Finbarr C Martin; Emma Godfrey; Ian D Cameron; Celia L Gregson; Nicola E Walsh; Anna Ferguson Montague; Jodie Adams
Author's provenances
1. University of Hertfordshire 2. School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Title:

Therapists’ perspectives on a new Structured Tailored approach to Rehabilitation AfTer HIp FragilitY Fracture – the Stratify Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial.

Background:

The stratify feasibility randomised controlled trial explored a risk-stratified rehabilitation intervention, where patients with hip fracture were categorised as low, medium, or high risk of poor outcome and received tailored interventions accordingly. This qualitative study aimed to understand therapists’ views on the acceptability of the approach, as well as barriers and facilitators to its implementation, to inform a future definitive trial.

Methods:

Following delivery of the intervention, all therapists took part in semi-structured interviews. The topic guide and deductive thematic analysis were informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability, the Theoretical Domains Framework, and fidelity domains (delivery, receipt, and enactment).

Results:

Nine therapists (n = 5 physiotherapists, n = 4 occupational therapists) participated in interviews. All viewed the approach as acceptable and expressed positive attitudes towards the intervention. Key enablers included alignment with professional roles, permission to dedicate time to appropriate therapeutic activities of daily living, confidence in delivering the intervention, and optimism about its benefits. Reported barriers included limited time due to staffing and length of stay, challenges engaging participants in emotionally distressing circumstances, and the need for a consultee to support decision-making and goal-setting, particularly in the high-risk subgroup.

Conclusion:

The Stratify approach was acceptable to therapists. Key facilitators and barriers to implementation were identified to inform a future trial on the effectiveness of the approach.

Comments

This is a really interesting topic which has potential to support people to receive the right care, while also optimising resources and promoting job satisfaction. What were the different interventions offered to each risk group? Also, I wondered whether patient experiences were explored and how these compared to staff?  

Submitted by frances.hallam_42069 on

Permalink

Good platform presentation - ypu csme across very well.  Well done.

Submitted by ian.thompson on

Permalink

Really good platform presentation and findings. Looking forward to see some of the follow-up work too! 

Submitted by h.wilson8@doct… on

Permalink

Well presented and looks like a positive change to deliver more equitable therapy care. 

It would be interesting to know the frequency/intensity of therapy for the different groups and if you felt you were supported with the level of staffing required. 

 

Submitted by thomas.wasmuth… on

Permalink

Great to see AHPs on the platform - well done. 

Really interesting to hear about a research rotation. What a great opportunity 

Submitted by michelle.bull_23544 on

Permalink