Evaluating and Improving Postoperative Pain Management in Hip Fracture Patients: A Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Project

Abstract ID
3829
Authors' names
Arun Joshi1, Samuel Healy1, Mohammed Rahman1, Sara Conroy1, Claire Porter1
Author's provenances
1 Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction 

Early mobilisation following hip fracture surgery is a key determinant of better health outcomes and reduced mortality. However, high levels of postoperative pain and inconsistent analgesia administration were noted as barriers to mobilisation on our dedicated femoral fracture unit. This quality improvement project aimed to understand pain and analgesia on the unit, and in doing so, target better pain relief to improve outcomes through optimised engagement with therapy. 

Methods 

Baseline data were collected on 26 post-operative patients to assess subjective pain scores (or Abbey Pain Scale where appropriate), pre-operative prescribing bundle adherence, and administration of PRN analgesia. Semi-structured interviews with ward nurses and therapy staff explored barriers to effective pain management and access to PRN analgesia. Using Model for Improvement methodology multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles were undertaken, including a test of change to trial use of a buprenorphine patch, staff education to target prescribing behaviours and nursing workflow optimisation. 

Results 

Initial data showed 30% of patients reported pain ≥8/10 on day one, with poor correlation between pain scores and PRN analgesia administered. Qualitative data revealed key barriers included staff workload, controlled drug (CD) access delays, poor interprofessional communication, and hesitancy around use of stronger opioids. Introduction of a one-off buprenorphine patch resulted in a 20% reduction in day one pain and a 23% reduction on day two. The highest reported pain was 7/10 (vs 10/10 pre-intervention). No significant increase in postoperative delirium was noted. However, PRN administration remained inconsistent despite improvements in pre-op analgesia bundle prescribing and communication strategies. 

Conclusion

 This multifaceted, multidisciplinary quality improvement project has provided valuable insight into understanding pain and analgesia on the hip fracture unit. The project has highlighted focus areas for strategies to reduce postoperative pain. However further work is required to address persistent barriers to PRN analgesia administration and promote sustained prescribing behaviours.

Comments

Great work.  Are fascia iliaca nerve blocks possible?  Might this be something to look at next?

Submitted by ian.thompson on

Permalink
An excellent point. FIB's are already routinely provided by the Orthopaedic team for most patients admitted with a NOF fracture, which usually happens preoperatively. We were looking specifically at postoperative pain management and the relationship with day one mobility. We have not considered postoperative FIB, but it may be a discussion and option worth considering. Albeit, this may have a negative impact on mobility due to the numbing effects on the quadriceps..?

Submitted by arun.joshi3@nhs.net on

In reply to by ian.thompson

Permalink
That's interesting. Definitely worth considering as a postoperative option as well then. Thank you

Submitted by arun.joshi3@nhs.net on

In reply to by ian.thompson

Permalink

Did you find any difference between confused patients vs those who were not confused?

I often find that there is a large % of cognitively impaired patients that won't ask for the PRN meds and therefore always seem to have less analgesia. Or just generally quieter patients who don't want to bother staff for pain relief.

Maybe some patient information/carer information about requesting analgesia would be beneficial. 

Submitted by thomas.wasmuth… on

Permalink
Unfortunately, patients with a diagnosis of dementia, or documented post-op delirium, generally received less PRN analgesia. Confused patients don't ask for PRN medication in the same way, and staff do not always recognise that behaviours are reflective of pain, and not just the patients "usual baseline". Agree that engaging carers that know the patient in the process would be beneficial, but carers are not always present. It is certainly a challenge, especially in the cohort of patients that get hip fractures.