Are Key Examinations Being Missed? An Audit of Musculoskeletal, Neurological, and Cognitive Assessments in Geriatric Clerking

Abstract ID
4051
Authors' names
A. Marshfield1, Dr C. Bowler2, Dr R. Willott2
Author's provenances
1 University of Nottingham, 2 Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction:

Thorough clinical evaluation is crucial in all specialties, but especially in geriatrics. Frailty, cognitive impairment, and reduced patient cooperation can obscure typical features, making diagnosis more challenging. Musculoskeletal, neurological, and cognitive assessments are particularly important for falls or confusion, where missed diagnoses such as delirium or fractures can worsen outcomes. This audit evaluated the quality of clinical examination during clerking and subsequent senior review on the Geriatric Assessment Unit (GAU), focusing on musculoskeletal, neurological, cognitive and mobility assessments by the multidisciplinary team within 24 hours.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis included data from 77 patients admitted to geriatric base wards via the GAU. An Abbreviated Mental Test Score (AMTS) assessed baseline cognition during clerking, and 4AT scores were used to screen for delirium, in line with NICE guidelines. Data were collected using paper-based clinical notes and digital 4AT scores. To address subjectivity, clear criteria were agreed to define adequate examination, and a second reviewer assessed borderline cases.

Results:

The audit found clinical examinations were often inadequate at first assessment. In initial clerking by a resident doctor, 51% of patients had adequate musculoskeletal assessment, 35% adequate neurological assessment, and 52% adequate AMTS. Senior review improved these to 69%, 40% and 57% respectively. 74% of eligible patients received a nursing or physiotherapy/occupational therapy assessment within 24 hours.

In a subgroup analysis of 31 patients presenting with a fall, 77% had adequate musculoskeletal examination: higher than the cohort average, suggesting greater adherence when clinically indicated. By contrast, among 16 patients presenting with confusion, 38% had AMTS completed, and 13% had adequate neurological assessment; no cases had both documented. Conclusion: Missed key assessments by junior and senior clinicians for falls or confusion may delay recognition of delirium or fracture, highlighting the need for targeted education and regular audits to improve adherence and patient outcomes.

Conclusion:

Missed key assessments by junior and senior clinicians for falls or confusion may delay recognition of delirium or fracture, highlighting the need for targeted education and regular audits to improve adherence and patient outcomes.

Comments

Fantastic project. Having worked in Geris, I always saw how annoyed my consultants would get when people wrote poor historians as things would be missed under this umbrella. With an ageing population, I think your conclusion is very important. 

Submitted by aman.patel6@nhs.net on

Permalink

Great audit! It's so easy to miss things like the AMTS or a full neuro exam when on a busy clerking day, and those details are absolutely vital for catching things like delirium early and preventing longer hospital stays. I think adding prompts for common presentations is a great way to improve adherence 

Submitted by aaleen.aizad2@… on

Permalink

This is a really interesting project- thanks for highlighting these issues. How did you define adequate examination for example adequate MSK exam? 

Submitted by anika.nathanie… on

Permalink

Well done for examining a crucial missed area, I agree with your conclusion that pre-existing diagnosis particularly dementia discourage clinicians from new cognitive assessments. This should be improved

Submitted by jenny.kakonge@… on

Permalink