Rationalising Blood Tests in the Elderly: An Audit of Routine Blood Investigation Requests in Geriatric Wards

Abstract ID
4013
Authors' names
Joy Lam Ern Hui1, Deepika Kumanan1, Ahmed Fayed1
Author's provenances
1 Geriatrics Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction

Blood tests are frequently ordered in geriatric wards, often without clear clinical justification. This can lead to patient discomfort, increased costs, and unnecessary workload on staff and laboratory services. This audit aimed to evaluate the frequency and appropriateness of blood test ordering and reduce unnecessary investigations in geriatric wards.

Method

We reviewed blood tests ordered over a 2-week period across the four geriatric wards at Leicester Royal Infirmary. Seven commonly requested tests were included: full blood count (FBC), urea and electrolytes (U&E), C-reactive protein (CRP), liver function tests (LFT), coagulation screen (Coag), bone profile, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP). Each test was assessed against a predefined criterion based on a proposed local guideline adapted from national recommendations.

Results

A total of 1,918 blood tests were performed during the initial audit, of which 907 (47%) were deemed unnecessary. Bone profile (53%) and coagulation screen (52%) had the highest rates of inappropriate requests. These findings were presented at a consultant meeting and departmental teaching, where reasons for over-ordering were explored and solutions discussed. Guidelines were circulated, and posters were displayed in all wards.

A second audit cycle showed some improvement: 1,638 blood tests were performed, with 721 (44%) found to be unnecessary. The most notable improvement was in coagulation screen requests, which decreased from 52% to 43%.

Conclusion

Nearly half of the blood tests ordered in geriatric wards were unnecessary, highlighting a need for more judicious test ordering. Interventions including education, guideline dissemination, and visual prompts led to a modest reduction in inappropriate testing. Continued efforts are required to reinforce appropriate testing and promote sustainable change in clinical practice. 

Comments

Even prior to reading this, I had a feeling the numbers for un-necessary tests might be very high. This is a great audit which shows practicing of overtly defensive medicine for analysing trends as opposed to at times judging clinical judgement. I wonder whether or not the bone profile or coagulations were done inappropriately to save on work load and not having to repeat taking blood - as at times they require extra blood bottles so cannot be added on. Again, this is a very insightful project that highlights potential cost savings for hospitals for testing as this is an issue that extends to many departments. Very good and practical points made in the discussion.

Submitted by hassannauyan3@… on

Permalink