A Structured Approach to Delirium Assessment in Older Patients Using the 4AT Tool​

Abstract ID
3959
Authors' names
Lin Pyae Phyo Aung1, Aung Kyaw Pyae1, Thyn Thyn1
Author's provenances
1Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction

 

Delirium is a medical emergency characterized by a recent (within hours or days) changing or fluctuating course of confusion. It manifests through altered arousal, inattention, and disordered thinking. Delirium had significant short- and long-term adverse clinical outcomes including extended length of stay, increased inpatient complications, elevated all-cause mortality, and reduced survival rates.(1) In January 2023, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) revised its delirium guidelines, endorsing the 4AT as the preferred assessment tool for detecting delirium in general clinical settings.(2)

 

Objectives

 

To evaluate the compliance of the 4AT screening tool for delirium detection among eligible elderly patients.

 

 

Methodology

 

A retrospective audit was conducted in two phases at Barnsley Hospital to evaluate the use and compliance with 4AT delirium screening. The initial phase reviewed 98 patient records to establish a baseline for current screening practices. Following this, a second phase analysed 336 patient records after implementing targeted quality improvement measures. These measures included making the 4AT tool a mandatory component of AMU clerking documentation, introducing clear exclusion criteria, promoting consistent use of the tool by clerking staff, and disseminating audit results to emphasise the clinical importance of early delirium identification.

 

 

Results

 

Compliance with 4AT completion was observed to be lower in the Hot Take proforma compared to the AMU clerking proforma. Overall performance of 4AT screening showed marked improvement following the implementation of interventions after the first audit cycle, increasing from 31.36% to 74% over the review period.

 

Conclusion

 

The audit demonstrated an improvement in the use of the 4AT screening tool for delirium assessment following targeted interventions. However, the small sample size in the first cycle and underutilization among diagnosed patients indicate the need for continued efforts to optimize its usage. Ongoing education, reinforcement of guidelines, and regular audits may further enhance delirium detection and patient outcomes. 

Comments

Is it worth considering a pop up function as a reminder to do the 4AT just as we get reminders for VTE risk assessment?

Submitted by tohan.odia@gmail.com on

Permalink

Yes, this would be a worthwhile consideration. Implementing a pop-up reminder for completing the 4AT, similar to the alerts used for VTE risk assessments, could help ensure timely delirium screening and promote consistent practice across the wards.

Submitted by lin.aung1@nhs.net on

In reply to by tohan.odia@gmail.com

Permalink

While VTE assessments are required for every hospital admission, the 4AT involves specific exclusion criteria—such as patients under 65 years—which would need to be incorporated into any electronic prompt.

Submitted by lin.aung1@nhs.net on

In reply to by tohan.odia@gmail.com

Permalink