Abstract
Introduction
Osteoporosis poses a significant health challenge in older adults, especially due to fragility fractures that increase morbidity and mortality. The FRAX tool, designed to estimate a 10-year risk of major osteoporotic and hip fractures, is a key resource for guiding treatment decisions. This audit evaluated how effectively FRAX scoring and primary prevention strategies were being used in a Front Door Frailty ward.
Methods: Two retrospective audit cycles were conducted. The first included 51 patients (May–August 2024), and the second 50 patients (January–April 2025), admitted with falls. Data collected included age, sex, Clinical Frailty Score (CFS), fall/fracture history, FRAX score completion, and osteoporosis treatment status.
Results: In the first cycle, patients averaged 82.8 years old, with 60.78% female and a mean CFS of 5.43. Prior fractures were noted in 19.61%, and 35.29% had previous falls. Only 27.45% received osteoporosis treatment, and FRAX scoring was rarely used.
The re-audit showed a mean age of 83, with equal gender distribution. Fall history rose to 82%, and fracture history to 42%. FRAX scores were recorded in just 30% of cases. Among high-risk patients, 53.13% received treatment, while 46.88% did not. Treatments included bisphosphonates (35%), vitamin D alone (30%), and calcium/vitamin D combinations (35%).
Conclusion: Despite a high prevalence of falls and fractures, FRAX scoring remained underutilized. Although treatment rates improved slightly (from 27.45% to 40.82%),nearly half of high-risk patients were still untreated. The findings highlight the need for better education, standardized protocols, and integration of FRAX into routine assessments. Barriers to FRAX implementation and treatment initiation, particularly in frail populations, require urgent addressing through education, protocol development, and integration of FRAX into admission assessments. Strengthening communication with primary care and adopting a multidisciplinary approach are essential to improve primary fracture prevention in frail older adults.
Comments
Very interesting point about…
Very interesting point about the underutilisation and when utilised not actioned appropriately. Taught about in medical school but massively underused in practice and may go a long way in improving patient outcomes if used appropriately.
Apprec
Thank you very much — I completely agree. The FRAX tool is simple and evidence-based, yet it’s often overlooked in day-to-day practice. Our audit really highlighted that gap between knowledge and implementation. With better integration into routine assessments and staff training, we can definitely improve patient outcomes.
Important Resource
This is a resource that is not fully utilized, we ran a similar audit in Rugby St Cross.
Great work
Appreciate your feeedback
Thank you! That’s great to hear — it’s reassuring to know others have identified similar gaps. Hopefully, with continued awareness and shared learning, we can all help improve how FRAX is used in everyday practice.
Appreciate your feedback
Thank you! That’s great to hear — it’s reassuring to know others have identified similar gaps. Hopefully, with continued awareness and shared learning, we can all help improve how FRAX is used in everyday practice.