Assessing the impact of a specialist frailty ward on deprescribing rates in older adults

Abstract ID
4361
Authors' names
M Aarons; S Benjamin; H Ramsbottom; L Whitter; J Murugesh; P McDonald
Author's provenances
Mersey and West Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction

Deprescribing is central to frailty care. We evaluated whether a Frailty Enhanced Specialist Service (FESS) was associated with higher deprescribing rates.

Method

Single-centre retrospective observational study using routinely collected data from inpatients admitted from care homes before the existence of FESS (January; n=78) and, post-implementation, to FESS or non-FESS wards in June (FESS n=54; non-FESS n=37) and December (FESS n=32; non-FESS n=49). We recorded total regular medicines and Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) scores at admission and discharge, plus age, sex, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Overall, mean age was 81.6 years; female 56.8% (142/250); mean CFS 6.8; mean Charlson 6.1. Median age and frailty scores were broadly similar between groups (range 82-84.5; 6-7). Within-group changes were analysed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Between-group differences in net change were assessed using Mann–Whitney U. Proportions of patients with any deprescribing or reduction in ACB were compared using χ² tests.

Results

Pre-FESS, there was no significant within-patient change in total medicines between admission and discharge (median 7→7; Wilcoxon p=0.28). The FESS ward showed significant deprescribing in June (median 8→7; p=0.0005), with a larger reduction by December (median 7→5; p=0.00019). Non-FESS wards showed no significant change at either time point. In December, deprescribing was greater on the FESS ward than in both pre-FESS and non-FESS cohorts (median −2 vs 0 medicines; Mann–Whitney p=0.00048 and p=0.00028). In December, deprescribing occurred in 72% (23/32) of FESS patients versus 20% (10/49) on non-FESS wards (χ²(1)=21.2, p<0.001; OR=9.96), and ACB fell in 41% (13/32) versus 6% (3/49) respectively (χ²(1)=14.5, p<0.001; OR=10.5).

Conclusions

Only the FESS ward demonstrated consistent, statistically significant reductions in total medication count. By December, it was associated with substantially greater ACB reduction than non-FESS care. This supports the role of dedicated frailty services in reducing polypharmacy in hospital inpatients. 

Comments

Excellent and important work,

What is the average length of stay on FESS v non FESS older people wards? 
What interventions carried out in FESS do you think contribute to improvement in deprescribing? 
Was there engagement with primary care services to ensure deprescribing was continued post discharge? 
Interested in how we can improve communication across the sectors and encourage team approach to deprescribing. 

Submitted by leeane.black@n… on

Permalink

Thanks for the positive comments

We do have the data on LoD which I can get for you next week

I think the main interventions were the presence of a specialist pharmacist, an experienced geriatrician ,the realisation of practicing realistic medicine in frail older patients from care homes who all had high frailty scores, reviewing indications especially re prognostic benefit. I think also being on a ward where patients may be in a number of days you can als be more confident in stopping medication safely.

Re community we highlighted in our discharge letter stopping meds and rationale 
Paddy McDonald Consultant Geriatrician