Prevalence and outcomes of physical frailty by cognitive status in older people with emergency hospitalisation in ORCHARD-EPR

Abstract ID
4451
Authors' names
Emily L Boucher1,2, Sasha Shepperd3, Sarah T Pendlebury2,4
Author's provenances
1University of Calgary; 2Wolfson Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, University of Oxford; 3Nuffield Dept. of Population Health, University of Oxford; 4NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and Depts. of General Medicine and Geratology, OUH NHS-FT
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Background: Over one-third of older people with unplanned admissions to hospital have physical frailty, but there are few data on prevalence and outcomes by cognitive status necessary to individualise care.

Methods: ORCHARD-EPR includes consecutive patients ≥70 years with length of stay (LoS) of ≥1 day (2017–2019) admitted to four Oxfordshire, UK hospitals. Physical frailty was determined using a modified Hospital Frailty Risk Score excluding dementia and delirium (mHFRS). Cognitive frailty was defined using a mandatory on-admission cognitive screen as one or more of 10-point Abbreviated Mental Test score (AMT)<8, dementia and/or delirium diagnosis informed by the Confusion Assessment Method-CAM. Hazard/odds ratios adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity and illness severity were determined for survival, LoS, readmissions for no vs any cognitive frailty.

Results: Among 28,590 patients (mean/SD age=81.8/7.4 years, 52% female), 9,137 were cognitively frail, including 6,197 with delirium. Most patients with cognitive frailty had moderate/severe physical frailty (mHFRS≥5; 73%; 6,677/9,137), but fewer than half with moderate/severe physical frailty had cognitive frailty (46%; 6,677/14,544). Physical frailty had limited effects on mortality in cognitively frail patients (moderate frailty: adjHR=1.11 [95%CI 1.04-1.19], p<0.001; severe frailty: 1.01 [0.92-1.11], p=0.82) but was more strongly predictive of survival in the cognitively robust (moderate: 1.22 [1.16-1.29], p<0.001; severe: 1.30 [1.16-1.45], p<0.001). However, physical frailty contributed to long LoS both in those with cognitive frailty (adjusted ORs for LoS>10 days, moderate frailty: 2.77 [95%CI 2.46-3.11], p<0.001; severe frailty: 6.98 [5.99-8.15], p<0.001) and without (moderate: 2.91 [2.69-3.15], p<0.001; severe: 8.31 [7.07-9.77], p<0.001). Physical frailty did not predict readmission in any group (p>0.1).

Conclusions: Physical and cognitive frailty frequently co-exist but differentially impact outcomes. Physical frailty adds little to mortality risk in cognitive frail patients, but increases hospital LoS. Findings support separate cognitive and physical frailty screening in hospital to better target interventions in high-risk groups. 

Presentation

Comments

I noticed that physical frailty was a strong predictor of a long hospital stay but didn't seem to impact mortality for patients who already had cognitive frailty. Based on this, do you think we should focus physical frailty interventions more on improving discharge planning rather than predicting survival in these patients?

Submitted by ayahassadi1@gm… on

Permalink

Thank you for your comment. Your comment raises an interesting question. The strong association between physical frailty and length of stay in hospital serves to highlight the importance of improving discharge planning for frail patients, particularly those with comorbid physical and cognitive frailty. The differential impacts of physical frailty on survival in groups with and without cognitive frailty underscores the importance of individualising prognosis. Of note, we did not consider the severity of cognitive frailty in this study in our analysis, but anticipate that physical frailty will be more predictive of survival in patients with mild cognitive impairment versus those with severe dementia.

Submitted by emily.boucher_29675 on

Permalink