Improving frequency of 4AT scoring through micro teaching

Abstract ID
4782
Authors' names
A Fernandes1; V Ketheeswaranathan1 ;T Serafimova1; G Meredith1
Author's provenances
1 Department of Clinical Gerontology, King’s College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction

Delirium is a neuropsychiatric condition affecting over 1 in 4 hospitalised older adults. Regular assessment of delirium throughout admission leads to earlier diagnosis and management and may potentially improve outcomes.  The 4AT is a NICE recommended  tool to detect delirium.

Methods

Retrospective case review was undertaken for a cross-section of older adults (n= 90) admitted to an inpatient geriatric ward in a tertiary London hospital. We recorded whether 4AT was completed at 3 key time points; during clerking, post-take ward round and at any point during inpatient stay. A plan-do-study-act methodology was used and two key interventions were introduced sequentially: 1. Micro-teaching and 2. Educational posters.

Results

The majority of patients had a pre-existing diagnosis of cognitive impairment (n=58, 64.4%). Prior to intervention, 4AT was documented infrequently at clerking (n=8, 26.7%) and at post-take review (n=14, 46.7%) but more frequently once admitted to the inpatient ward (n=21, 70%). Following the teaching intervention, no change was observed in frequency of 4AT completion during admission clerking (n=6, 20.7%) and post-take review (n=9, 31.0%). 4AT completion increased during inpatient review by 16.2% to 86.2% (n=25). Following distribution of posters and visual aids, 4AT completion rates did not change at admission clerking (n=7,  23.3%), post-take (n=6, 20.0%) and during inpatient review (n=26, 86.7%).

 

Conclusion

4AT completion was infrequent, particularly at admission. Microteaching increased frequency of 4AT completion for elderly medicine inpatients. There was no improvement in completion at admission (clerking and post-take). Posters and visual aids had limited impact. Microteaching could be a valuable strategy to prompt behaviour change amongst doctors. Further work could identify barriers to 4AT completion at admission and strategies to improve completion. 

Comments

What did your microteaching intervention involve? Who/ when/ where etc? Did it capture all doctors involved in clerking or consultants carrying out PTWRs?

Submitted by alice.oconnor15646 on

Permalink