Stepping biomechanics of the transition into stair descent in naturalistic homes using instrumented insoles

Abstract ID
4714
Authors' names
J Wootton1; C Maganaris1; TM Bampouras1; RJ Foster1; T O’Brien1
Author's provenances
1. Research Institute for Sports and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, UK
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction:

Stair falls frequently occur during the transition from level walking to stair descent. Laboratory research indicates that the demands of transition steps are different to continuous descent, yet these findings have not been confirmed in home environments where most falls occur.

Using instrumented insoles in naturalistic experimental homes, this early-translational study quantified biomechanical differences between transitional and continuous descent and explored the influence of lighting conditions.

Method:

Five participants descended a 14-step staircase in an experimental home under bright and dim lighting; three trials per condition in a randomised order. An insole inertial measurement unit (Walk With Path) quantified absolute foot angle in sagittal (+ve: below horizontal) and transverse (+ve: out-toeing) planes at initial contact, and peak vertical foot acceleration during loading of the 1-step transition (Step1, right foot), 2-step transition (Step2, left foot), and continuous descent. 

Results:

Sagittal and transverse-plane foot angles were significantly lower in both transition steps than continuous descent (p<0.05). Group mean angles did not differ between lighting conditions for any step, but sagittal-plane variability on Step1 was greater in dim light (IQR: 4.14° bright vs 12.1° dim).

No significant differences in peak loading acceleration were found between steps or lighting conditions (p>0.05). However, variability was greater in the transitions than continuous descent, and was greater on Step1 in the bright than dim condition (IQR: 18.89ms-2 bright vs 10.91ms-2 dim). 

Conclusion:

This novel, early-translational study found more neutral foot angles and greater loading variability during level-to-stair transition than during continuous descent. These behaviours are associated with known fall risk factors, so may contribute falls during stair transitions. The changes in movement variability in dim lighting warrant further investigation to understand their interacting effects on safety.

Wearable sensors show promise for measuring stair biomechanics and can enhance future research understanding fall mechanisms and intervention effectiveness in real-world settings.

Comments

Would you expect the same results in a sample of older people who may have a more conservative approach to negotiating descending stairs?

Submitted by j.menant@neura… on

Permalink

The effects of the transition stair in older people is an important consideration as stair negotiation does differ between younger and older adults looking at the magnitudes and variations of the outcomes. But we also know that transitions in older adults do differ to continuous descent in a lab environment and so we would expect a similar pattern of change if this study were with older participants. Though the magnitudes of the outcome measures may differ between younger and older adults, we expect these patterns of change to still be present. This is an important next step in progressing this research though to investigate these effects further. 

Submitted by j.wootton_41844 on

In reply to by j.menant@neura…

Permalink