Measurement of health status

Introduction:

The use of pneumonia scores to stratify the prognosis is very useful in general terms, since it allows objectively evaluating the risks in these patients.

Methods:

mixed type open study, first cross-sectional phase Test vs. Test, second phase follow-up at 8 and 30 days. Carried out between November 2017 and April 2018. The main objective was to determine the usefulness of pulse oximetry as a substitute for urea of the CURB 65 score in the evaluation of the severity of pneumonia in geriatric patients.

Results:

65 patients, gender distribution was comparable, the main age group was made up of people over 65 years of age. The frequency of comorbidities was greater than 90%, among which hypertension, diabetes and smoking stand out. The mean hospitalization time was 10 days. The variable that most defined the need for hospital admission was hypoxemia with a percentage of 72%, regardless of the score on the CURB 65 scale, it was shown that oxygen saturation <92% is associated with a high 30-day mortality rate ( 43.07%) n=28, (p 0), with a relative risk of at least 4 times more to die. When correlating the CURB 65 and CORB 65 scales with Spearman's Rho test, a correlation coefficient (0.898) was obtained.

Conclusions:

pulse oximetry proved to be a good substitute for urea in the CURB 65 score, useful for defining hospitalization, severity, and mortality in patients with CAP.

Introduction

Patients with frailty who have emergency admissions are at risk of mortality and may benefit from Anticipatory Care Planning (ACP). Appropriate identification, to target limited resource in an in-patient environment can be challenging. We conducted a prospective study on a cohort of frail in-patients with a hospital admission of ≥ 72 hours duration.  We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the SPICT tool alongside Clinical Frailty Score (CFS) as a predictor of mortality to improve our targeting of patients for ACP.

Method.

On a single day a SPICT form was completed prospectively for each inpatient on 3 hospital inpatient wards (Complex Frailty Unit, General/Orthopaedic Rehabilitation, Step-Down Unit).  Patients were deemed SPICT positive if they scored on ≥ 2 General Indicators and ≥ 2 Clinical Indicators. CFS was also recorded. Electronic records of this patient cohort were followed up for 9 months.

Results

Of 66 inpatients, 58 (87.9%) were aged ≥ 65 years and had a CFS ≥ 4. Mode CFS value = 6 (23 patients, 39.7%).  32 (55.2%) were SPICT positive; 26 (44.8%) SPICT negative.  At 3 months follow-up SPICT had Positive Predictive Value (PPV) 40.6% and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) 84.6% for mortality. At 6 months PPV = 56.3%; NPV = 80.8%. At 9 months PPV = 59.4%; NPV = 76.9%.  SPICT negative patients with CFS 6 had mortality risk of 14.3% at 3, 6 and 9 months follow-up respectively.  SPICT positive patients with CFS 6 had mortality risks of 50% at 3 months and 62.5% at 6 and 9 months.

Conclusion

SPICT is a predictor of mortality in patients with frailty during unplanned admissions to hospital of ≥ 72 hours duration.  It is now used alongside CFS for all patients admitted to our Complex Frailty Unit, identifying patients most likely to benefit from inpatient ACP on discharge.