The Quality of ResPECT Forms and the Confidence of Resident Doctors

Abstract ID
4950
Authors' names
Noor Shakiry, Panagiotis Kyprianou, Mark Vettasseri
Author's provenances
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS trust
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category

Abstract

Introduction: ReSPECT (Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment) forms should contain personalised recommendations for a person’s future clinical care. Our project assessed the quality of ReSPECT forms and attempted to understand the training resident doctors received and their confidence completing forms. 

Method:  A scoring system out of 9 was created to assess the quality of ResPECT forms. The system assessed factors including legibility, patient and family involvement and mental capacity assessments. It also covered the clarity of documentation around resuscitation, escalation and preferences around future readmissions and preferred place of care and death. We subsequently surveyed resident doctors about the training they received and their confidence completing ReSPECT forms. 

Results: We assessed 50 ReSPECT forms in an elderly care department. 74% received a score of 6 or below and were felt to need improvement. Only 52% of forms documented an escalation status, 42% commented on future hospital admissions, 12% documented a preferred place of care or death. 23% of forms contained vague statements unlikely to help decision-making in an emergency scenario. 28% of forms had legibility issues. 31 resident doctors (between foundation year 1 and registrar level) completed our survey. 84% of respondents had received teaching on ReSPECT forms in the last year, but 71% wanted additional training. 52% did not feel comfortable discussing ReSPECT forms with patients and relatives and 32% did not feel comfortable completing the form. 37% felt simulated or ward-based training on how to discuss the topic and complete a form, would be beneficial. 

Conclusion: There is scope to improve the quality and clarity of the clinical guidance documented on ReSPECT forms. The reported lack of confidence by resident doctors may be a contributory factor. Increased use of ward-based or simulated training may represent a way of improving their confidence and skills. 

Comments

Thank you for this interesting project. The finding that most doctors had received recent teaching, yet many still lacked confidence in discussing and completing ReSPECT forms, was particularly striking.

I wondered whether confidence differed between junior and more senior trainees, and whether there was any association between the quality of forms and the grade of doctor completing them. It will be interesting to see whether ward-based or simulated training improves both confidence and documentation quality.

Thank you for sharing this work.

Submitted by harriet.virely… on

Permalink

Thank you for this comment

Most Doctors completing the form were F1s and F2s, I agree it would be quite interesting to see quality of forms related to the seniority of the clinician.

If we re-audit this QI we will consider looking at these factor's too as well as the potential benefit of SIM / Ward based teaching 

Thank you again

Thank you for this

Yes that would be very interesting to know

If we decide on a re-audit I would definitely consider implementing a focus onto the link between seniority of doctors and quality of ReSPECT form

Submitted by noor@shakiry.com on

Permalink