Health Inequities and Fall Risk: Analyzing the Association of the PROGRESS-PLUS Model and the Algorithm Proposed by the WFG

Abstract ID
4693
Authors' names
N C P Avelar1; B S Moreira2,3; A C S Andrade3; J L Torres4; J S C Amorim5; M Montero-Odasso6; M F Lima-Costa2,3; A L Danielewicz1; M R Perracini7
Author's provenances
1. Department of Physiotherapy, Federal University of Santa Catarina; 2. Center for Studies in Public Health and Aging, Federal University of Minas Gerais; 3. Oswaldo Cruz Foundation; 4. Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Federal University of
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction: Although global guidelines for fall prevention and management in older adults exist, using the algorithm from the World Guidelines for Falls Prevention and Management for Older Adults (WFG) in low- and middle-income countries is little explored. Evaluating the association between health inequities and fall risk can guide more effective and equitable interventions. The obhective of this study was to assess the association between health inequities, as defined by the PROGRESS-PLUS model, and fall risk according to the algorithm proposed by the WFG in older Brazilian adults. Methods: A cross-sectional study using data from 5,219 participants aged ≥60 years from the second wave of the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil, 2019-21), a nationally representative study, was conducted. The outcome was the fall risk classification into three levels: low, intermediate, and high. Exposure variables included health inequities according to the PROGRESS-PLUS model (e.g., place of residence, race/skin color, sex, and occupation). Multinomial logistic regression analyses were conducted (with low risk as the reference category), incorporating groups of variables based on a theoretical model. Results: A positive association was found between intermediate fall risk and female sex, older age (70–79 and ≥80 years), macroregion of the country, poor self-perceived current life regarding income/employment, and monthly household income per capita. Additionally, female sex, older age (70–79 and ≥80 years), macroregion of the country, poor self-perceived current life regarding income/employment, education level, perceived discrimination, does not participate in organized social activities and physical disorder in the neighborhood were positively associated with high fall risk. Conclusion: Health inequities are associated with intermediate and high fall risk among older Brazilian adults. Social and health actions, along with integrated and intersectoral public policies targeting the reduction of social inequities and focusing on modifiable determinants, may contribute to fall prevention.

Comments

Really nice poster! Curious to hear more about the differences across regions and whether the authors consider aspects of the environment contribute to the variation in fall risk across regions in Brazil? Or whether there are other factors related to the region that may be influencing the findings?

Submitted by lisa.alcock_39950 on

Permalink

Thank you for the question. We believe environmental factors may play an important role in explaining the regional differences we observed. Brazil has substantial heterogeneity in urban infrastructure, socioeconomic conditions, access to healthcare, and neighborhood characteristics, which may influence fall risk. In fact, neighborhood physical disorder was associated with high fall risk in our study. However, our analysis was not designed to identify the specific regional mechanisms involved. Other factors, such as differences in healthcare services, social support, and regional inequalities, may also contribute. Future multilevel studies are needed to better understand these pathways.