Implementation of pharmacist falls clinic recommendations in primary care

Abstract ID
4690
Authors' names
Sadie Parry1, Anneka Mitchell2
Author's provenances
Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust1
Abstract category
Abstract sub-category
Conditions

Abstract

Introduction

A multidisciplinary falls clinic was established where patients are reviewed by a nurse, physiotherapist, and pharmacist and interventions made to reduce the risk of falls. The pharmacist conducts a structured medication review and fracture risk assessment (FRAX) and provides recommendations to the patient and their GP. The aim of this project was to evaluate the number and type of recommendations made by the pharmacist and whether they are implemented in general practice.

Method

Patients were included if they attended the falls clinic between 1/1/24 and 1/7/24. Data on recommendations were collected from clinic letters sent to GPs. GP connect and patient letters were used to ascertain if recommendations were implemented. Data collected included demographics, number of medication recommendations stratified by type, number of non-medication recommendations e.g. DEXA scans and referrals.

Results

There were 97 eligible patients (67% female), the median age was 79 (IQR 9) years. In total, 255 recommendations were made (mean 2.6 per patient). 79% (n= 202) were medication changes, of these 41% (n=83) were initiating and 39% (n=79) stopping medications, 20% (n=40) recommended dose changes to current medications. Twenty DEXA scans were requested. Non-medication recommendations (excluding DEXA scans) made up 13% (n=33) of recommendations including referrals to other clinics, blood pressure checks and compression stockings. Most recommendations (71%, n=144) were implemented in primary care. The median implementation time was 25 (IQR 39) days.

Conclusions

Pharmacists make a substantial number of recommendations in the specialist falls clinic and most are implemented by the GP but this can take time. Further work is needed to understand when recommendations are not implemented and whether independent prescribing could be used to facilitate faster implementation. We would also like to evaluate whether interventions made in clinic reduce the risk of further falls.

Comments

Very interesting research! Are there are common medications (or classes of medications) that were either stopped or started?

Submitted by lisa.alcock_39950 on

Permalink

A nice looking poster that grabs attention. Nice to see a multidisciplinary approach, do you have any thoughts on how to speed up implementation?

Submitted by l.walker39@nhs.net on

Permalink

Great to see MDT working in this way as well as proactive medication reviews. It would be interesting to see the potential barriers to implementation and what can be done to improve this 

Submitted by aliceking2_12647 on

Permalink

really informative poster, do you think in a demographic with less of an ageing population the results would be similar? 

Submitted by heather.bain_28286 on

Permalink

Well done, this research highlights the need for faster implementation of medication changes post pharmacy review, with the idea of independent prescribing this would give autonomy to the pharmacist and also reduce the impact on GPs but would there be any communication issues post implementation? I imagine a positive response and a cost-effective solution as medications that are stopped would safe money and the time it takes for a GP to do the changes. Is this something that is going to be brought your your MDT so you can review if this has a positive effect? 

Submitted by rojhan.cooper@… on

Permalink